by Marta Baziuk
The Ukrainian Weekly
January 7, 2001
TORONTO - The full significance of an event or act is not always appreciated
until later. Such may be the case with the International Commission of
Jurists Inquiry into the Famine in Ukraine, according to Ian Hunter, a
renowned lawyer, professor and author, who delivered the annual famine
lecture in Toronto.
The event was organized as part of a seminar series of the Canadian
Institute of Ukrainian Studies and co-sponsored by the Toronto Branch of the
Ukrainian Congress and the Center for Russian and East European Studies at
the University of Toronto.
Mr. Hunter served as general counsel to the international commission, formed
at the initiative of the World Congress of Free Ukrainians. He described the
precedent-setting work of the commission as "an audacious and ambitious
attempt to set the historical record straight by use of the modern trial
process" and mused about why its report, released in May 1990, was not more
In outlining the workings and findings of the seven-member commission, Mr.
Hunter said its mandate was to scrutinize the evidence objectively and
dispassionately to arrive at the truth. In the process of fact-finding, it
examined the testimony of historians, demographers and actual survivors, as
well as books, monographs, documents from embassies, newspaper accounts and
eyewitness accounts of witnesses. Most harrowing, he said, were accounts of
the brutal requisitioning of all foodstuffs and what would happen when
hidden stores were found.
Mr. Hunter distinguished the following areas in which the international
commission's findings were unanimous:
"overwhelming evidence" exists that the famine occurred in Ukraine from 1932
to 1933, peaking in the spring of 1933;
the famine was man-made and not the result of climatic conditions or other
the three main causes were compulsory grain requisitions, collectivization
of agriculture and dekulakization; and
Soviet authorities not only refrained from sending aid but took a number of
steps that exacerbated the famine through decrees and enforcement of an
internal passport system that condemned people in the areas of starvation.
The commission concluded that, at a minimum, 4.5 million people had died in
Ukraine. Although we now know that the figure may be closer to 10 million,
Mr. Hunter asserted that it was correct of the commission to estimate
conservatively in order to safeguard its reputation as independent and
objective at a time when the Soviet Union steadfastly denied that there was
a famine to investigate.
While a majority of the jurists found that "the Soviet authorities had
decreed and promulgated measures that would foreseeably bring about famine
and hindered relief efforts," three members found that it was not possible
to prove the legal crime of genocide and thus to apply the term genocide as
defined by the United Nations Convention.
Mr. Hunter also spoke about the testimony before the commission of Malcom
Muggeridge, a friend of his whom he called a decent, honest and courageous
man and perhaps the greatest journalist of the century. Because Mr.
Muggeridge was old and quite ill at the time of the inquiry, the commission
traveled to his home in Sussex, England to take his testimony.
Writing for the Manchester Guardian, 30-year-old Mr. Muggeridge had traveled
through Ukraine in the spring of 1933 - he had his translator buy the
railway pass since he would not have been allowed to purchase one. What he
saw horrified him. He witnessed people dying of starvation, sometimes in
sight of granaries guarded by soldiers. His articles were smuggled out via
British diplomatic pouch.
Mr. Hunter described the taking of Mr. Muggeridge's testimony as a poignant
vindication of a man who had been vilified for his honesty, most famously by
Walter Duranty, a New York Times reporter during the famine, who called Mr.
Muggeridge a liar (although privately Mr. Duranty said that millions had
died), and by George Bernard Shaw, who called Mr. Muggeridge "a hysterical
During the question and answer period, members of the audience suggested
reasons that the report did not receive more attention. It was suggested
lack of funds resulted in less than adequate print quality and distribution
efforts. Mr. Hunter pointed out that by the time of the report's release in
1990, to some extent, events had overtaken the commission's inquiry, with
Mikhail Gorbachev acknowledging the famine. It is likely he did so,
according to Mr. Hunter, because he knew the commission was about to rule.
Mr. Hunter concluded by calling the International Commission of Jurists
Inquiry into the Famine in Ukraine a "ground-breaking initiative" and a
"noble undertaking" that could serve as a model for future efforts to
address allegations of atrocities.
The event was held on November 30, 2000, at the Munk Center for
International Studies at the University of Toronto.
The Ukrainian Weekly, January 7, 2001, No. 1, Vol. LXIX