HOT COPY By Paul D. Colford
New York Daily News, New York, NY
Friday, October 24, 2003
Will the Pulitzer Prize board revoke the controversial 1932 award to Walter
Duranty, the Moscow correspondent of The New York Times and an
apologist for dictator Josef Stalin?
The question loomed after this week's revelation that Times publisher Arthur
Sulzberger Jr. told the board that the paper will "respect" whatever it
decides. The panel meets next month.
Sulzberger's letter followed the board's announcement in June that a
subcommittee would review complaints about Duranty's failure to report on
the Stalin-engineered famine that killed millions in the Ukraine in 1932 and
Sulzberger enclosed a dim review of Duranty's work that the paper
commissioned from Mark von Hagen, a history professor at Columbia.
Von Hagen said of Duranty's 1931 reporting, which earned him the Pulitzer:
"Much of the 'factual' material is dull and largely uncritical recitation of
Von Hagen added that "it is far less surprising to me that he would deny in
print the famine of 1932-33."
Still, recalling the Stalinist practice of airbrushing "purged figures" out
of official records, Sulzberger added, "it would be peculiar to recognize
the evils of Stalinism by airbrushing" Duranty out of the Pulitzer annals.
The Ukrainian Congress Committee of America yesterday expressed
dismay over Sulzberger's response.
The Manhattan-based group said: "We only hope that The New York
Times will do the right thing and honor the millions of victims by
to their readership, the famine survivors and the Ukrainian-American
community and denounce" Duranty's Pulitzer.
An editorial due to run in The Ukrainian Weekly, in Parsippany, N.J., says:
"If The New York Times cannot physically 'return' the Pulitzer, then it must
repudiate its recipient and renounce his prize."
New York Daily News, NY, NY, Friday, October 24, 2003
FOR PERSONAL AND ACADEMIC USE ONLY